|
|
| Line 14: |
Line 14: |
| desc none | | desc none |
| </imagemap> | | </imagemap> |
|
| |
| Depending on the make/buy/co-creation decision, the development of different sub-systems and components will either be done in-house or externally. In the ''acquire and integrate'' model, the main focus will be on coordinating and integrating the suppliers of the different subsystems. Only when applying the ''"in-house development"'' strategy will development management be of full concern.
| |
|
| |
| Regardless of who will eventually be responsible for the development and implementation, it is a critical success factor for any AIoT product or solution. Accordingly, [[AIoT_Execution_and_Delivery|Part IV: Technical Execution]] covers this in full detail. From the point of view of the [[Business_Execution|Part III: Business Execution]], it is important to understand when the development perspective is important (i.e., in the case of in-house development), and how to interface with it from a business point of view. The discussion in [[Product_/_Solution_Design#From_requirements_and_design_to_implementation_and_validation|Requirement & Design]] provides a good overview of this.
| |
|
| |
| Finally, it should be understood that while the technical execution perspective introduces DevOps as the key paradigm to manage continuous product improvement, including the technical systems operations perspective, this is only a part of what is required from a business operations point of view. For this reason, the next section takes an explicit look at the holistic business operations perspective.
| |
