AIoT Product Viewpoint: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
__TOC__
__TOC__


== <span id="StoryMap"></span>Story Map ==
= <span id="StoryMap"></span>Story Map =
It is best practice in the agile community to break down a larger body of work into specific work items using a hierarchical approach. Depending on the method applied, this hierarchy could include themes, epics, features, and user stories.
It is best practice in the agile community to break down a larger body of work into specific work items using a hierarchical approach. Depending on the method applied, this hierarchy could include themes, epics, features, and user stories.


Line 35: Line 35:
The example shown here is the story map for the ACME:Vac product. It has six epics, including HMI, Cleaning, Maps, Navigation/Sensing, Configuration and Status/History. Each epic is broken down into a small number of key features supporting the epic. User stories are not shown on this level.
The example shown here is the story map for the ACME:Vac product. It has six epics, including HMI, Cleaning, Maps, Navigation/Sensing, Configuration and Status/History. Each epic is broken down into a small number of key features supporting the epic. User stories are not shown on this level.


== Feature Team Mapping==
= Feature Team Mapping =
One of the main challenges in almost all product organizations is creation of efficient mapping between the organizational structure and the product structure (the same applies to projects and solutions). The problem here is that organizations are often more structured around skills (UX, frontend, back end, testing, etc.), while product features usually require a mixture of these skills.
One of the main challenges in almost all product organizations is creation of efficient mapping between the organizational structure and the product structure (the same applies to projects and solutions). The problem here is that organizations are often more structured around skills (UX, frontend, back end, testing, etc.), while product features usually require a mixture of these skills.


Line 45: Line 45:
The result of the analysis shows that a number of components on the robovac, the cloud and the mobile app must be created or extended in order to support this user story. A similar analysis must be done for all other user stories of the overarching feature before a proposal for the supporting feature team can be made. In this case, the feature team must include a domain expert, an embedded developer, a cloud developer, a mobile app developer, and an integration/test expert. To support the scrum approach, who in the feature team plays the role of product (or feature) owner, as well as the scrum master, must be agreed upon.
The result of the analysis shows that a number of components on the robovac, the cloud and the mobile app must be created or extended in order to support this user story. A similar analysis must be done for all other user stories of the overarching feature before a proposal for the supporting feature team can be made. In this case, the feature team must include a domain expert, an embedded developer, a cloud developer, a mobile app developer, and an integration/test expert. To support the scrum approach, who in the feature team plays the role of product (or feature) owner, as well as the scrum master, must be agreed upon.


== Sprint backlogs ==
= Sprint backlogs =
In preparation for each sprint, an individual sprint backlog must be created for each team, which is specific to the upcoming sprint. The sprint backlog is derived from the story map (essentially the product backlog). The sprint backlog contains only those items which are scheduled for implementation during that sprint. The sprint backlog can contain user stories to support features, but also bug fixes or non-functional requirements.  
In preparation for each sprint, an individual sprint backlog must be created for each team, which is specific to the upcoming sprint. The sprint backlog is derived from the story map (essentially the product backlog). The sprint backlog contains only those items which are scheduled for implementation during that sprint. The sprint backlog can contain user stories to support features, but also bug fixes or non-functional requirements.  


In larger organizations with multiple feature teams, the Chief Product Owner is responsible for the overarching story map, which serves as the product backlog. He prioritizes product backlog items based on risk, business value, dependencies, size, and date needed, and assigns them to the individual teams. The teams will usually refine them and create their own sprint backlogs, in alignment with the Chief Product Owner and the product/feature owners of the individual teams.
In larger organizations with multiple feature teams, the Chief Product Owner is responsible for the overarching story map, which serves as the product backlog. He prioritizes product backlog items based on risk, business value, dependencies, size, and date needed, and assigns them to the individual teams. The teams will usually refine them and create their own sprint backlogs, in alignment with the Chief Product Owner and the product/feature owners of the individual teams.

Revision as of 16:28, 19 September 2021

Business ViewpointUsage ViewpointData/Functional ViewpointImplementation ViewpointProduct ViewpointProduct ArchitectureAIoT Product Viewpoint

The Product Viewpoint must map the other elements of the Product Architecture to the key elements of an agile product organization. The main artefact here is the agile story map, which is the highest level structural description of the entire body of work. Feature team mapping supports the mapping of the work described in the story map to the teams needed to implement the different product features. Finally, for each team and each sprint an individual sprint backlog must be created, based on the story map and the results of the feature team mappings.

Story Map

It is best practice in the agile community to break down a larger body of work into specific work items using a hierarchical approach. Depending on the method applied, this hierarchy could include themes, epics, features, and user stories.

A story map organizes user stories in a logical way, in order to present the big picture of the product. Story maps help ensure that user stories are well balanced, covering all important aspects of the planned solution in a similar level of detail. Story maps provide a two-dimensional graphical visualization of the Product Backlog. Many modern development support tools (such as Jira) support automatic visualization of the product backlog as a story map.

The AIoT Framework assumes the following hierarchy:

  • Epic: A high-level work description, usually outlining a particular usage scenario from the perspective of one of multiple personas
  • Feature: A specific feature to support an epic
  • User Story: short requirements written from the perspective of an end user

Depending on the complexity of the project and the agile method chosen, this may need to be adapted, e.g. by further adding themes as a way of bundling epics.

When starting to break down the body of work, one should first agree on a set of top-level epics, and ensure that they are consistent, do not overlap, and cover everything that is needed. For each epic, a small number of features should be defined. These features should functionally be independent (see the discussion on functional decomposition). Finally, features can further be broken down into user stories. User stories are short and concise descriptions of the desired functionality told from perspective of the user.

Example: Initial Story Map

The example shown here is the story map for the ACME:Vac product. It has six epics, including HMI, Cleaning, Maps, Navigation/Sensing, Configuration and Status/History. Each epic is broken down into a small number of key features supporting the epic. User stories are not shown on this level.

Feature Team Mapping

One of the main challenges in almost all product organizations is creation of efficient mapping between the organizational structure and the product structure (the same applies to projects and solutions). The problem here is that organizations are often more structured around skills (UX, frontend, back end, testing, etc.), while product features usually require a mixture of these skills.

Consequently, the AIoT Playbook recommends an approach based on feature teams, which are assigned on demand to match the requirements of a specific feature. See Agile AIoT Organization for a more detailed discussion. Feature teams can exist for longer periods of time, spanning multiple sprints, if the complexity of the feature requires this.

Mapping User Story to Components and Feature Team

In the example shown here, the user story "Change cleaning mode" (part of the cleaning mode configuration feature) is analyzed. The result of the analysis shows that a number of components on the robovac, the cloud and the mobile app must be created or extended in order to support this user story. A similar analysis must be done for all other user stories of the overarching feature before a proposal for the supporting feature team can be made. In this case, the feature team must include a domain expert, an embedded developer, a cloud developer, a mobile app developer, and an integration/test expert. To support the scrum approach, who in the feature team plays the role of product (or feature) owner, as well as the scrum master, must be agreed upon.

Sprint backlogs

In preparation for each sprint, an individual sprint backlog must be created for each team, which is specific to the upcoming sprint. The sprint backlog is derived from the story map (essentially the product backlog). The sprint backlog contains only those items which are scheduled for implementation during that sprint. The sprint backlog can contain user stories to support features, but also bug fixes or non-functional requirements.

In larger organizations with multiple feature teams, the Chief Product Owner is responsible for the overarching story map, which serves as the product backlog. He prioritizes product backlog items based on risk, business value, dependencies, size, and date needed, and assigns them to the individual teams. The teams will usually refine them and create their own sprint backlogs, in alignment with the Chief Product Owner and the product/feature owners of the individual teams.